Aerotek Director Luke Moran and Strategic Account Executive Kimberly McHugh have years of experience designing and implementing workforce recruitment and retention strategies, and they have seen first-hand the impact of attrition programs that don’t quite hit the mark.
Without a well-defined and consistent process for analyzing attrition, employers find themselves lacking data to inform fundamental staffing decisions. Worst of all, Moran says, they have no idea how much attrition is costing them.
“I liken it to mortgage interest — we get so focused on how much the monthly payment is that we aren’t really aware of the ‘hidden’ costs,” he says. “If we ever take a look at how much interest we pay over the life of the mortgage, it’s staggering how high that amount is.”
“Without a structured attrition strategy, it can be difficult for employers to quantify the costs, including productivity, time lost and missed revenue opportunities,” Moran adds.
Replacing a lost worker costs about 33 percent of that person’s salary, including loss of intellectual property knowledge and retraining the replacement worker, as well as the negative impact on getting the work done.” There are huge expenses that are often overlooked,” agrees McHugh.
Commoditizing the recruitment process can lead to an emphasis on salary or staffing costs at the expense of scrutiny on the real, total costs. “Tracking attrition offers insight into the proportion of attrition and the underlying reasons,” explains McHugh.
There are useful data points that can be gleaned from tracking attrition month-to-month as well as on an annualized basis. If you’re only tracking a full year of activity, Moran says, you’re missing crucial opportunities to react and make course-corrections to address issues in real time.
It also helps keep retention top of mind, McHugh says. “It’s critical from a cost standpoint to have consistent measurements.”
Optimum attrition rates vary by industry, employment status (full- or part-time), tenure and skill set. Turnover tends to be highest in the first 30 or 60 days, Moran notes, which is even more true in this competitive hiring market. And yet even at that early point, companies have likely incurred significant onboarding and training costs.
Building up benchmarks can take some time, but they are invaluable in determining progress.
At times, attrition issues can masquerade as other workplace challenges, such as increased overtime. In addition to significant costs, high turnover places an unnecessary burden on remaining workers who have to pick up the slack and continually support the replacement worker’s learning curve.
A failure to address high attrition rates can do serious harm to your business, says Moran. “It costs time and money, causes stress to your tenured employees and can even jeopardize your ability to get products out the door. Retention is mission critical and it deserves to be at the forefront of your talent management strategy.”
Ideally, Moran and McHugh recommend that organizations implement a process that:
These benchmarks can provide actionable data to support their workforce management strategies and drive results.
“I have seen significant improvements to a company’s bottom line just by implementing effective attrition tracking and measurement,” says Moran. “It was able to cut a $10 million cost in half, and the increased productivity also led to a boost in revenue.”
If you’d like to learn more about effective attrition management and retention programs, contact Aerotek now.